Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Onion Peeler's avatar

Thanks for the write-up. Some things that popped in my mind when I read the thesis:

* On what basis are you assuming they will add 1000 systems FY23 and 1200 in the upcoming years? Also, according to the license revenue projection from FY23 and onwards, it assumes that all of the added systems are installed and accounted for from first day of the year. A more realistic scenario is that they install some continuously, which would add some latency to the revenue. But I assume you purposely modeled as you did for simplicity.

* There only seem to be 1 valid paper about this device https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36576854/

However majority of the authors are associated with Cutera, and the whole study only includes 14 test subjects. So there is a risk this paper is funded and biased by the company itself to make it look better on the surface. They could have purposely chosen their subjects with the highest probability to yield good results by chosing people with certain ethincity, skin-type, etc.

* The " Accutane has a ~ 90% efficacy rate. " statement should be taken with caution. How many test subjects is this based on, who presented this number (if it is from the company itself, do not count it as unbiased), etc...

* "Aviclear has an 88% “worth it rating”, " This number is based on 80 reviews, which is a bit low IMO. Also, I'm not sure how reliable and unbiased these reviews are. Perhaps they don't represent the real "worth rating" accurately since these reviews could just be made by the company more or less. But I could be wrong here since I do not know much about this webpage

* I don't quite follow how you calculate fee revenues? Also what do you mean when you first state 30-50 patients are treated per year, but then 3.5 patients per year? 3.5 + 30-50 ? I am just a bit confused here :)

* With all this said, say the product only turns out to be an "OK" which mostly works but not as effective as they portray it to be, leading to a bit more conservative values where it takes longer time for people to accept it as a legit replacement to antibiotics and other treatments (IMO more realistic). Say we have 3.5 FY23 to 6 FY26 patients a year with only 600 newly placed systems per year as the first year, what value would you get instead with your multiples?

Thanks

/O

Expand full comment
Bam's avatar

What’s your feelings about this past weeks earnings?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts